Built for Indian advocates · India-only

Research, analyse and draft — grounded in the actual law.

HarLegal answers statute-first and citation-verified across Central & State Acts and Supreme & High Court judgments — then helps you spot case weaknesses and draft in your own style.

Advocate accounts approved manually · Clients join by invite

Punishment for dishonour of a cheque?

Under [S1] NI Act, 1881 §138, dishonour for insufficiency of funds is

punishable with imprisonment up to two years, or fine up to twice the

cheque amount, or both.

confidence: high1 source verified ✓
0+
Acts indexed
29 jurisdictions
0+
Judgments
SC + prime High Courts
0%
Citations verified
or it abstains

Everything in one workspace

From a question to a filing-ready draft

§

Legal research

Ask in plain English. Get a statute-anchored answer with the exact sections and precedents — and the sources to check.

⚖︎

Per-matter Q&A

Answers grounded in one client's file + the shared law, strictly isolated to that matter.

🛡

Case-weakness analysis

An adversarial self-review flags documentary, limitation, procedural and evidentiary gaps — with lawful next steps.

Smart drafting

Your own past drafts become reusable templates; generate a client-ready document and export .docx.

Verify or abstain

Every citation is checked to exist; if the sources don't support an answer, it says so instead of guessing.

🔒

Privacy-first

Client identities are pseudonymised before any cloud call and restored locally. Drafting stays on-device.

A living corpus

Never blocked by a missing source

Cite an Act, section or judgment we don't hold yet? HarLegal fetches it on demand from official sources, indexes it, and cites it — so your research never stops at “not found”.

1
🔎

You ask or cite

Mention any Act, section or case — even one outside the current library.

2

We fetch & index

HarLegal locates the official text, extracts and embeds it in seconds.

3

Cited & reusable

It's grounded into the answer with a verifiable citation — and ready next time.

Starts at 7,713+ Acts and 15,077+ judgments — and grows every time you ask.

Why it's trustworthy

Statute-anchored. Citation-verified. Honest.

Legal answers are only as good as their grounding. HarLegal anchors every proposition to a statute first, supports it with precedent, checks each citation actually exists, and — when the corpus doesn't support an answer — abstains rather than inventing one.

  • Hybrid retrieval (meaning + keyword) across acts, judgments and your matter
  • Statute-currency aware (IPC vs the 2023 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, by incident date)
  • Citations verified for existence; hallucinated references flagged
  • Confidence signal + abstain when grounding is weak
Example matter

“Is my client's s.138 complaint maintainable?”

⚠ No proof of service of the statutory notice (procedural · high)
⚠ Original cheque-return memo missing (documentary · high)
⚠ Limitation: 30-day notice window (timeliness · medium)

Adversarial self-review — each with a lawful suggested step.

On-device by default
Local model + embeddings; nothing leaves the laptop unless you opt in.
PII pseudonymised
Names/IDs swapped for placeholders before any cloud call, restored locally.
Tenant isolation
Row-level security: each advocate sees only their own clients & matters.
Encrypted at rest
Uploaded files AES-256-GCM encrypted; per-advocate keys.

Confidentiality by design

Built for privileged data

Client confidentiality and DPDP are first-class. Strong cloud models are available when you want them — with client identities stripped before they ever leave your device, and restored only in your own reply or draft.

Simple pricing

Start free, scale when you do

Pilot
₹0Invitation only
  • Full research + matter Q&A
  • Local model (private)
  • Up to 3 clients
  • Community support
Request access
Most popular
Practice
₹1,999/ advocate / mo
  • Everything in Pilot
  • Bring your own cloud key
  • Unlimited clients & matters
  • Drafting + .docx export
  • Client portals
Request access
Firm
Let's talkfor chambers
  • Everything in Practice
  • Multiple advocates
  • Priority support
  • Onboarding help
Request access

Ready to try it on a real matter?

Request an advocate account — each is approved manually for the pilot. Questions? Write to us.